Brands & Trends. August – September 2016


On 23 August 2016, the Ukrainian Government (the “Government”) green lighted the winding up procedure of the State Intellectual Property Service of Ukraine (the “Service”), and transformation of State Enterprise “State Intellectual Property Institute of Ukraine” (the “UAPTO”) into governmental organization – duumvirate of regulatory bodies, which were regulating the intellectual property system in Ukraine since 2011.

The Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine (the “Ministry”) – a successor of the Service – will also acquire two affiliates of the Service: State Organisation “Ukrainian Agency for Copyright and Related Rights” (responsible for collective management of copyright and related rights) and State Enterprise “INTELZAKHYST” (responsible for maintaining of the register of control marks for marking of certain copyrighted works and, since recently, assistance in combating Internet piracy).

On the wrecks of the existing institutional IP Empire, the Government expects to establish a two-tier system – the National Agency for Intellectual Property (the “National IP Agency”) that will be subordinated to the Ministry. While the full impact of the institutional reform on the intellectual property system is yet unclear and will be assessed mainly by the progress and quality of laws and regulations adopted, IP rights holders should keep the eyes open to avoid any negative legal consequences during or after the transitional period.

The length of transitional period

The road map approved by the Government does not contain an exact date by which the National IP Agency should be finally established. Presumably, searching for the best world practices should be completed in September 2016, and the draft law on improvement of state regulatory measures with respect to intellectual property system should be submitted to the Government in October 2016. Once the Ukrainian Parliament adopts the respective law, the Government will have two months to establish the National IP Agency. In the best-case scenario, the establishment of the National IP Agency will be completed early in 2017. In the worst-case scenario, the transitional period may take the entire year of 2017, or even longer.

In order to avoid a regulatory vacuum, the Service will continue to regulate intellectual property system until its power is assigned to the Ministry.

It is not clear whether the UAPTO will continue to exist up to the creation of the National IP Agency. So far, it is assumed that it will continue to carry out its functions during the transitional period, including accepting and examining the applications with respect to trademarks, inventions, utility models and designs.

Lifehacks for IP rights holders: how respond to the institutional reform?

IP rights holders should consider taking the following steps during the transitional period:

  • Consult with the IP counsel to determine the status of the institutional reform prior to (i) filing new applications with respect to trademarks, inventions, utility models and designs with the UAPTO; (ii) filing IP assignment agreements with the Service; and (iii) initiating IP litigation (NB: the Service is usually engaged in the IP court proceedings as a co-defendant).
  • Consider an expedited examination of application that have been already filed to avoid a potential negative impact of the institutional reform on the registration, when the reform is at its peak.
  • Consider timely consideration of the complaint(s) filed with the Service’s Board of Appeal prior to liquidation of the Service.
  • Closely monitor the status of application that have been already filed with respect to trademarks, inventions, utility models and designs to avoid a potential loss of files and double check bank details before making any further official payments within the existing applications.

We will continue to closely monitor these developments and provide timely updates.


With effect from 19 August 2016, the National Bank of Ukraine (the “NBU“) abolished the requirement for Ukrainian residents to obtain a price evaluation act – an approval from State Enterprise “State Research and Information Centre for International Commodity Markets Monitoring” (“Derzhzovnishinform”) – for cross-border payments for purchases of IP rights from foreign residents for the value exceeding EUR 50,000.

The reasoning behind price evaluation acts was that they were supposed to prevent non-productive outflows of capital from Ukraine in the form of payments for intangible assets, such as IP rights. Where payments exceeded the regulatory threshold (most recently, EUR 50,000), a Ukrainian payer was required to apply to Derzhzovnishinform for the document (price evaluation act) confirming that the price of IP rights purchased under the contract was consistent with their fair market value. If a price evaluation act was not available, Ukrainian banks were prohibited from arranging the payment (save for a few exceptions).

Abolishment of the price evaluation act requirement is definitely a positive step in terms of simplifying cross-border activities of the Ukrainian business. At the same time, the NBU still maintains control over similar outbound transfers. In particular, the NBU is currently empowered to review the underlying documentation and suspend outbound transfers exceeding USD 50,000.

The NBU also continues its policy of strengthening the financial monitoring procedures and increasing the level of control by Ukrainian banks over capital outflows. In particular, the NBU has instructed Ukrainian banks to carry out a detailed analysis of transactions and obtain additional documentation from clients, where the bank has concerns that the contractual price of goods, services or assets may be inconsistent with their fair market value.

This news was prepared  in cooperation with Sayenko Kharenko Banking & Finance practice.

For more information, please contact Oleksandr Padalka or Oleg Klymchuk.

Related news

26 January 2023


The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has approved the list of goods, exportation or importation of which is subject to licensing, and quotas for 2023
26 January 2023


The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has prolonged the Resolutions adopted in 2015 that impose restrictions on the importation of goods originating from the russian federation
26 January 2023


Possible changes in the regulation of GMOs and GM-products
Notification cookies

We use cookies to analyze the behavior of visitors
of our website and improve it. By using our website, you consent to these cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.