The year 2016 was eventful for competition lawyers in Ukraine. Many improvements were initiated and implemented by the new leadership of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine (AMC) that was appointed just over a year ago and immediately took steps to transform the AMC into a modern and effective competition agency. This reform was supported by the Parliament of Ukraine that adopted important amendments to competition laws.
Methodology on Fines Calculation
The reform started with the development of the Guidelines for Calculation of Fines for Violation of Ukrainian Competition Law (the Guidelines) in September 2015 that were designed to increase the transparency and predictability of fines imposed by the AMC. Ukrainian law allows the AMC to discretionary determine the amount of the fine up to a maximum cap calculated as a percentage of the worldwide turnover of the undertaking (e.g. 5 per cent for merger control violations). To make fines more predictable, the Guidelines introduced a methodology, which the AMC should follow when determining the amount of fine for a violation. The process consist of two phases: (1) determination of the basic amount of fine that depends on the income achieved in the market affected by the violation, and (2) adjustment of the basic amount taking into account mitigating or aggravating circumstances.
Amnesty for Merger Control Violations
Along with the methodology for fines calculation, the Guidelines introduced an amnesty programme for past merger control violations. The amnesty programme was initially supposed to last for one year until 15 September 2016, but following numerous discussions and in response to petitions from the business community, the AMC has extended the amnesty period for another half a year, until 15 March 2017.
Under the amnesty programme, in case an undertaking discovers that it failed to seek a merger clearance approval from the AMC for one of its past M&A transactions completed prior to 15 September 2015, such undertaking may apply to the AMC to obtain the approval post factum. In this case, the AMC undertakes to impose a relatively small fixed fine of UAH 102,000 (approx. EUR 3,600), irrespective of the turnover of the violator.
Publication of Decisions
Another step towards transparency of the AMC’s procedures was the decision of the AMC to publish extracts from its decisions starting from July 2015. This practice later became mandatory, following the amendments to the law which obliged the AMC to publish the following information on its official web-site:
New Merger Filing Thresholds, Fast-Track Review and Other Procedural Changes
Major changes to the merger control regime stem from the Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to the Law of Ukraine “On Protection of Economic Competition” Concerning the Increase of Efficiency of Control over Economic Concentrations” (the Law), which was adopted by the Parliament on 26 January 2016 and came into force on 18 May 2016. This Law increased the financial thresholds and introduced a number of other important improvements to the merger control regime.
According to the Law, merger clearance, in the form of approval of the AMC for concentration, is now required in any of the following two cases:
All thresholds are calculated for the previous financial year on a group-wide basis, which means that the turnover and value of assets for all undertakings connected by a control relationship must be added together, including for the seller that controls the target.
In addition to raising financial thresholds, the Law also abolished the market share threshold that was used in the past (the merger filing was required in case the market share of any party to the concentration, or combined market share of all parties, exceeded 35 per cent on the relevant market).
Fast-Track Review Option
The Law also introduced expedited review procedure that should be applied to transactions with no or insignificant effect on competition in Ukraine. According to this procedure, the AMC will review a merger filing and grant the approval for concentration within 25 calendar days (reduced from the usual 45 days) in any of the following cases:
Other Procedural Changes
In addition to abovementioned improvements, the Law introduced the following procedural changes to merger control process in Ukraine:
New Regulation on Concentration
In order to implement the Law, the AMC adopted amendments to its main procedural merger control document entitled the Regulation on Concentration, the restated version of which came into effect on 19 August 2016. The amended regulation abolished numerous formalistic requirements and significantly reduced the list of required information and documents for filing. These changes were aimed to make merger clearance less burdensome for those transactions that have no impact on competition in Ukraine. At the same time, for the transactions that may potentially influence Ukrainian markets, the AMC requires more thorough and comprehensive economic analysis of market information and the expected consequences of the concentration. The amendments to the Regulation on Concentration could be summarized as follows.
What to Expect Next?
The merger control reform clearly shows the intention of Ukraine to harmonize the merger control regime with best practices of other European countries. Improvement of nexus requirement along with simplification of the filing process will allow the AMC to efficiently perform its tasks aimed at control over markets and to reduce unnecessary attention to transactions that do not affect competition in Ukraine.
The recent legislative and regulatory changes show a remarkable improvement in comparison with the previous merger control regime in Ukraine that saw no changes for over a decade. The AMC is also expected to align its other procedural documents in order to achieve synergy and efficiency in notifications and cases review. In particular, the procedure for review of cases on violation of economic competition requires certain immediate improvements. Current procedural rules allow the AMC to investigate cases for as long as it deems necessary and do not impose any deadlines on the AMC’s officials. Furthermore, the procedural rights of the parties in the process should be extended and should be spelled out more thoroughly. In addition, the AMC’s procedural documents governing the review of notifications for approval of concerted practices, including the Concerted Practices Regulation, were not amended in the first stage of the reforms. In this area, the AMC continues to apply formalistic requirements and low filing thresholds, which should be addressed in the next phase of reforms.